Comments on: Site lock and domain name http://blog.vortixgames.com/site-lock-and-domain-name Tue, 10 Aug 2010 02:49:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: ArcadeNano http://blog.vortixgames.com/site-lock-and-domain-name/comment-page-1#comment-54 ArcadeNano Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:37:25 +0000 http://blog.vortixgames.com/?p=131#comment-54 LOVE your site, will visit again :) Submitted this post to Google News Reader. LOVE your site, will visit again :) Submitted this post to Google News Reader.

]]> By: Vlad http://blog.vortixgames.com/site-lock-and-domain-name/comment-page-1#comment-17 Vlad Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:26:11 +0000 http://blog.vortixgames.com/?p=131#comment-17 Very well spot Bob! Although I would say that portals with that FQDN are not enough to worry about site-lock wise, the purpose of the method is more wide than just the site-lock. Thanks, I'll take a look at it. Very well spot Bob!

Although I would say that portals with that FQDN are not enough to worry about site-lock wise, the purpose of the method is more wide than just the site-lock.

Thanks, I’ll take a look at it.

]]> By: Bob Ippolito http://blog.vortixgames.com/site-lock-and-domain-name/comment-page-1#comment-16 Bob Ippolito Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:33:18 +0000 http://blog.vortixgames.com/?p=131#comment-16 You really just want to be checking that the host part of the URL ends with the domain that you specify. This solution is complicated and only works if the domain is two parts, which might not be the case in some countries (e.g. example.co.uk -> co.uk which is obviously not intended behavior). You really just want to be checking that the host part of the URL ends with the domain that you specify. This solution is complicated and only works if the domain is two parts, which might not be the case in some countries (e.g. example.co.uk -> co.uk which is obviously not intended behavior).

]]>